All results obtained by LAB Fit in a curve fitting can be accessed through a dialog box like the one shown below








Residuals button: displays the scatter plot of residuals, including the result of the Durbin-Watson test. Presented below are typical values for the Durbin-Watson test and the corresponding residual scatter plots for three proposed fits.The mentioned datasets are available in the LAB Fit software.



1. Positive autocorrelation of residuals (DW test almost or equal to 0.0)

Residuals of the same sign cluster together. If a residual is positive, the next one is very likely to be positive as well, creating a "wavy" or "cyclical" pattern. See the example below, resulting from fitting function number 17 to the dataset "DW test almost 0 (function n. 17).txt":





2. No Autocorrelation of residuals (DW test close or equal to 2.0)

The residuals are completely independent. Knowing the sign of a residual makes it impossible to predict the sign of the next one. See the example below, resulting from fitting function number 11 to the dataset "DW test close to 2 (function n. 11).txt":





3. Negative Autocorrelation of residuals (DW test almost or equal to 4.0)

Residuals constantly alternate signs. A positive residual is immediately followed by a negative one, and vice versa. See the example below, resulting from fitting function number 6 to the dataset "DW test almost 4 (function n. 6).txt":







Note: In simplified terms, DW values between 1.5 and 2.5 are generally considered "acceptable" or "normal" in curve fitting, presenting no cause for concern. For values significantly outside this range, the curve fit should be critically evaluated and the causes identified. After that, the user can decide whether or not to be tolerant.

Example: Based on the DW test, could function number 102 (obtained with LAB Fit Finder, DW = 1.8829) better represent the dataset "DW test almost 0 (function n. 17).txt" than function number 17 (DW = 0.2251)? View the new scatter plot of residuals:





So, from the perspective of the DW value, the answer is yes: function number 102 represents the mentioned dataset better than function number 17.



| Back |